Skip to content
Guess what? Valuesider just got better: smarter and more intuitive.
SINA CORP

SINA

SINA CORP

SINA CORP historical holders

total: 3

Himalaya Capital Management SINA CORP transactions over time

Total transactions:
2
New positions:
1
Sold out:
1
Held since:
2016 Q4
Held for:
6 quarters
Latest activity:
2018 Q2
Li Lu has been an institutional investor in SINA CORP (SINA) since 2016 Q4. According to 2026 Q1 report, Li Lu doesn't hold any shares. The fund/company first acquired SINA in 2016 Q4, initially purchasing 52,300 shares. Since the initial investment, Himalaya Capital Management has made 1 more transaction in this position.

When did Li Lu exit their SINA position?

Li Lu no longer holds SINA CORP (SINA). They sold off their entire position in 2018 Q2, closing out an investment that began in 2016 Q4.

When did Li Lu first invest in SINA?

Li Lu first invested in SINA CORP (SINA) in 2016 Q4 at the reported quarter-end price of $60.78 per share, acquiring 52,300 shares in their initial purchase.

What is Li Lu's average cost basis for SINA?

Based on historical transaction data, Li Lu's estimated cost basis for SINA CORP (SINA) is approximately $60.78 per share. This represents their average reported price* across all buy transactions.

Estimated cost basis*

Weighted AVG buy price:
$60.78
Weighted AVG sell price:
$104.26

SINA transactions history by Himalaya Capital Management

2 results
Period % of
portfolio
Shares
held after*
Reported
price*
Value* % (shares)
of activity
% change
to portfolio
2018 Q2
0.00%
$104.26
-100% (-52,300)
2016 Q4
2.85%
$60.78
new
* Shares, change to shares, sold shares, shares held after: split-adjusted.
* Reported price: this doesn't represent the actual buy or sell price. It is the split-adjusted price of the security as of the last day of the reported period.
If the security is completely sold out, we show the reported split-adjusted price prior to the actual period.
* Estimated cost basis: based on "Reported price*" (not earlier than 2013 Q2). Calculation starts from the latest "new buy" activity to the latest "close out" activity (if any).
* Value or Price: If the security is completely sold out, we show the reported value (or price) prior to the actual period.
* New buy or own: this means there is no earlier reporting (for us or in general). So we can't know if the actual purchase of the security happened at the reported period or earlier.